.
Feedback

This is How Bi-partisan Compromise Works

County Executive Rob Astorino and the bi-partisan coalition of legislators who voted Friday to approve the 2013 budget tell the story of how they achieved a responsible compromise.

 

Last Friday the 10 of us – a bi-partisan majority of the Board of Legislators joined by County Executive Rob Astorino – came together to approve a $1.7 billion budget for 2013 that we all firmly believe promotes and protects the best interests of Westchester residents.

It is not a perfect budget. They never are. There is never enough money to pay for every request. But it is a sound budget, both fiscally and socially. It does not raise the county tax levy. It safeguards the county’s AAA credit ratings. It funds the delivery of essential services in our Public Safety, Health, Parks, Social Services, Veterans, Public Works, Transportation and other county departments. And, it maintains a strong safety net for our neediest residents.

How this budget was arrived at tells the story of how responsible compromises are achieved.

Last year, the County Executive and the Board of Legislators – Republicans and Democrats – all agreed to two goalposts around which budget negotiations would be framed: no increase in the $548 million county property tax levy and no further raiding of the county’s emergency reserves.  

The reasons were obvious. As the county with the highest property taxes in the United States, it was clear that taxpayers in Westchester had reached a limit. It was also clear that the reserves had to be shored up. Moody’s, the ratings agency, had told the county its AAA credit rating was at risk if it continued to drain emergency reserves to pay day-to-day operating expenses. Losing the AAA rating would in effect become a long-term tax increase because it would make it more expensive for the county to pay its bills for years to come.

Working within the two goalposts, a 2012 budget was fashioned.  

Last month, the county executive proposed a 2013 budget that again stayed within the bi-partisan framework. And like the year before, he said that everything between the goalposts was negotiable. In other words, the legislators had $1.7 billion to work with, an amount equal to about $1,800 for every county resident.

But last week an impasse was created when a majority of the board’s Democrats said they planned to raid the reserves instead of making tough but necessary decisions on spending.

It was then that the team behind the coalition budget was formed: two Democrats and seven Republicans on the board partnering with the county executive. In a classic example of give-and-take, the coalition split the difference between the initial proposals by the county executive and the counter proposals supported by BOL Chairman Ken Jenkins and a majority of Democrats.

Highlights of the compromise include:

  • Subsidized day care will be funded with a 27% parent share, instead of the 35% initially proposed by the county executive but above the 20% proposed by the Democratic majority.
  • Public safety, emergency services, probation, and the DA’s office will receive additional funding. Parks will see the restoration of four positions, including three curators, and the Department of Public Works will see the return of 5 engineering positions. In all, the coalition budget restores 30 positions (25 filled and 5 vacant).
  • ArtsWestchester will receive $1.25 million and Cornell Cooperative will receive $800,000. In both cases, more than initially proposed but less than what the majority of Democrats had sought.
  • Balancing the budget will still require more than 100 layoffs. Most, if not all, of those layoffs could have been averted had the CSEA, the county’s largest union, agreed to a new contract that included employee health care contributions just like almost everyone else pays. But unlike three other county unions, the leadership of the CSEA refused to make a deal.

 

When it came time to vote on Friday, all of the rules were followed in passing the budget. It is important to remember that it doesn’t matter which party legislators belong to when they cast their votes. Conscience guides their individual votes and majority rule dictates the outcome for our democracy.

The coalition budget demonstrates how it is possible to stick to principles and still move to middle ground. Changes were made but the goal posts remained in place. No one side got everything, but all sides contributed to the solution. That’s real compromise and good government for the residents of Westchester County.

By County Executive Robert P. Astorino and the coalition of seven Republicans and two Democrats who voted Friday to approve the 2013 budget:

John Testa (R-Peekskill)

Michael Smith (R-Greenburgh)

Michael Kaplowitz (D-Somers)

David Gelfarb (R-Rye Brook)

Sheila Marcotte (R-Tuckahoe)

Jim Maisano (R-New Rochelle)

Bernice Spreckman (R-Yonkers)

Gordon Burrows (R-Yonkers)

Virginia Perez (D-Yonkers)

smellypants December 13, 2012 at 04:45 pm
Where Where?
smellypants December 13, 2012 at 04:49 pm
Unions, along with their pals in the Democratic Party, are the single largest reason this country is in decline. Their leaders are nothing but a bunch of goons and thugs who should be thrown in jail. Unions are not America. Unions are communist.
Stuy Guy December 14, 2012 at 03:46 am
The overwhelming comments on this blog unmask the reality.The conservatives that dominate the dialogue here are clear. This battle isn't about taxes or cutting government spending.
It is about breaking the Unions. When the working class is unable to leverage power with their numbers, all power will belong to those who have accumulated wealth, and they will call the shots in the society. Period. Witness the NHL Owners. They demand a better deal than the one they negotiated a few years ago, and they're willing to shut down the sport to do so. YOU work for ME. You will do what I say. I'm in charge. When I aggregate opposition to Unions, academics, Hollywood, trial lawyers, Democrats - as the source of society's problems, I see the formula: strip these few vestiges of power, and structure America as it once was. The few in charge, the many glad to have a dollar or two, the NFL on Sunday, shopping at the Mall. Retirement with comfort for the average person? Forget it. No real pensions. The many will survive at the pleasure of the few. The power to shape the society through govt by voting will be overshadowed by the power of immense money, marketing to the average person a message that will persuade them to vote to voluntarily surrender their economic leverage to pols who are owned by the wealthiest interests. Unions are communist? Then the right-wing is Fascist attempting nothing less than a quiet Revolution of the Right. Nazism without the goosestep.
Phyllis Karlin December 14, 2012 at 05:11 am
Easy for anyone to say if they have never been a union member. I have first hand seen the benefits of a union. I grew up in a small town in Georgia, a cotton mill town. Everyone new, if they tried to form a union, the plants would shut down. So many worked in the cotton mills, and the poor, just grew poorer. The cotton mill owners got richer. People lost their arm, so what, no union, just your fault. Mold every where, no one to defend them when they could no longer work. Finally health inspectors shut them down, so they moved on to make more money outside our country, where they paid workers 25 cents each hour, worked little children, no air, no heat and doors locked, so no exit. The owners just got richer and were not controlled by U.S. Laws but always allowed to bring these products back ton the good old USA and sell them at a very high price!
Phyllis Karlin December 14, 2012 at 05:29 am
I wrote the message above this message, I made several errors, new should have been the word knew. Sorry, I do not know how to correct posting, if someone knows please pass this info to me. Without unions, the poor will get poorer, but the owners will most certainly get a lot richer. I am sure the owners of all the companies are laughing their way to the banks. They are celebrating that now they can pay less and they are so happy they sold this concept to others. They did a great job making the top richer and getting others to support the top per cent earners.
SPK December 14, 2012 at 10:19 am
Another case of "eat your young..."
So long as I have mine, the heck with the young union member who will lose his/her job.
SPK December 14, 2012 at 10:35 am
Jeff, unions in the private sector are going the way of Sears, print newspapers, Readers Digest, $3 gasoline, and Twinkies.
In 10 years they will be gone...and workers will have voted with their wallet (and feet). Great victory this week for worker rights in Michigan. More to come.
The Entertainer December 14, 2012 at 12:22 pm
It's amazing how many of you drank the Kool-Aid. Wisconsin and Michigan are such fantastic states, role models.......I can't help but chuckle at your ignorance. "Right To Not Work" should be the new motto for those states.I wonder if any of you have, nor care about the children in our society.God help the next generation if we continue this "Race to the bottom" idealogy.We may as well go back to slavery, wipe the slate clear and start all over again! Unions protect EVERY worker in this country and don't ever forget it it! Your wage was increased because of the union movement and struggles from organized labor! When was the last time you heard about the SCABS doing something good in the community???????? No answer?? I didnt think so! You people that knock the unions disgust every bone in my body. You are uneducated and jealous towards the people that look out for the working class........and That, my friend , is every single one of us! The labor movement fights every waking moment to make everyones life just a little better.......wow! what a horrible concept. Drink more of the Kool Aid! I'm sticking with the UNION movement! Men&Woman who care about this great country and are willing to fight the good fight every day for the working class!
Ross Revira December 14, 2012 at 12:37 pm
Why are all the union toadies so scared of "right to work". Does unionism take away an American's right to choose what organization they wish to join or contribute to. Just recently after Hurricane Sandy a non-union power company was turned away in Westchester by Con Edison workers because of their status as non- union. Was the UNION thinking of ALL the peoples well being? Love the entertainment.
jo December 14, 2012 at 12:43 pm
we gets me about civil service unions. is that they want ME to pay for them..something I cannot pay for myself..why should my pay be decreased so they have better pensions and health care then I have.. less money in my pocket means less I can contribute. Their attitude borders on shear selfishness.. and let us not forget many civil service workers are not taxed on those pensions monies They need to join the rest of the workers and pay into their pensions a bit and also their health care and stop overburdening the tax payer....
Aidan December 14, 2012 at 12:46 pm
Ross, don't mention that stuff.
Irony of ironies ... Walmart has interest in Twinkies. WALMART.
jeff meyer December 14, 2012 at 01:00 pm
Aidan, I disagree with your assertion that unions on a whole are inflexible and not responsive to concessions. That is not the reality. Virtually every public employee union has agreed to concessions since 2008. One of my brothers is the BA of a trade union in CA. He is the top guy in charge of 4,000 trades men/women. They have conceded benefits in order to save jobs. Unions understand the reality. However, the point of collective bargaining is that the worker has a place at the table. A say in the matter. Aidan, without unions the WalMart model would be the norm. No rights for workers. Worker abuse. Sorry, that is not the world that I wish to live in. For those who think that unions will disappear all I can say is that is wishful thinking. Unions are not going away. Collective bargaining is the law of the land. Unfortunately workers have taken the benefits of unions for granted. I say bring on the RTW laws. When workers have to make a choice between union vs. non union then the choice will be clear. Unions shall prevail and thrive. Jeff Meyer Tuckahoe, NY
Teleman December 14, 2012 at 01:02 pm
I agree that PRIVATE sector unions are a good and neccessary foil to the profit driven motives of business. And I appreciate the battles fought to improve pay and working conditions. But to be forced to pay union dues and have no choice in the matter is just wrong. That's what this is really about - union dues- Why should someone who has socioeconomic and political beliefs different from the union be forced to funnel money into those things through dues? It's a fact that most of the stimulus money bama gave away went to maintain public sector and private sector union jobs- which all funnel dues money right back into the democrat party. FACT.
Teleman December 14, 2012 at 01:05 pm
There is NO place in opinion for unions in the public sector- the system is rigged for collusion and we're reaping the "benefits" of the sick relationship between politicians and burocrats who negotiate these public employee contracts that the states and local municipalities can't afford.
Teleman December 14, 2012 at 01:08 pm
There is a BIG difference between someone negotiating a contract with their own money opposed to other peoples money-
jeff meyer December 14, 2012 at 01:23 pm
Fortunately your opinion is not the law of the land. I find it rather ironic that you find it disturbing that unions exercise their legal rights in terms of political contributions yet not a word regarding "Citizens United". I assume that in your world it would be proper that only the extremely wealthy have a voice in the political process. You need to rid yourself of the plantation mentality. Jeff Meyer Tuckahoe, NY
sayitsnotsojack December 14, 2012 at 01:49 pm
You need to move to China then you will be in the workers paradise.
Aidan December 14, 2012 at 01:52 pm
Jeff: "I find it rather ironic that you find it disturbing that unions exercise their legal rights ..." Hmm. BUT you're NOT disturbed that folks are FORCED to join a union? Can't have it both ways.
sayitsnotsojack December 14, 2012 at 01:52 pm
You are only thinking about yourself, you could care less if the rest of us go broke paying for you and your union buddies unsustanible pensions, health plans, and salaries that drive the cost of living so high many of us are just able to pay our bills.
sayitsnotsojack December 14, 2012 at 02:00 pm
Mr. Meyer forgets that union contributions use many members money who do not agree with the politics of the entity that recieves the money they are forced to pay.
jo December 14, 2012 at 03:01 pm
why are civil service workers exempt from paying taxes on their pensions.. the rest of us do.. ????????????????????? not paying their FAIR SHARE ...
smellypants December 14, 2012 at 04:27 pm
It is really nice how you feel for millionaire hockey players - poor guys being abused by the owners. Start another league if you want to. What utter dribble.
smellypants December 14, 2012 at 04:29 pm
Why don't you just move to China or some other workers utopia?
smellypants December 14, 2012 at 04:31 pm
We need to slash retiree and health benefits immediately for government employees and have them contribute as well. Bunch of freeloaders.
SPK December 14, 2012 at 06:38 pm
To the Entertainer: "Your wage was increased because of the union movement and struggles from organized labor!"
You are misguided. Wages are set in the marketplace, and are ultimately paid by either customers or taxpayers. If employers over-pay, then they ultimately go out of business usually made worse by dumb work rules (Twinkies), or under-pay and they lose good workers. I do see a role for unions negotiating work conditions, and ensuring consistent employer personnel policies.
bruiser December 14, 2012 at 06:46 pm
jo what about churches? should they pay
SPK December 14, 2012 at 06:46 pm
Jeff Meyer, if joining a union is such a good deal for workers, then why do unions need the force of law to compell people to join involuntarily.
Kind of reminds me of ObamaCare and its 1000+ waivers already granted to friends of BHO and Nancy Pelosi. Right to Work fixes this abuse of forcing people to join something in order to work. Michigan workers will quickly benefit as employers choose to come to Michigan for first time in decades.
Bob Zahm December 14, 2012 at 06:55 pm
SPK - unions are afraid of right to work legislation because it weakens there ability to strong arm workers into paying protection money. they will position the requirement that all employees pay union wages as a way of avoiding given some a free ride at the expense of other greater group. There should and will be a drop in union protection [ur, dues] payments which will hopefully force the unions to re-focus on what workers want and get out of playing poltics, investing retirement funds to support pet gov't projects, etc.
Jasper Black December 14, 2012 at 07:59 pm
Where unions exist it is because a majority of the workers affected have voted to have one. Once established, a union represents ALL workers in a workplace, including those who voted against union representation. What RTW laws do is force the union to represent free riders, workers who get the benefits of union representation without paying for them. In most cases, understandably, workers will choose not to pay union dues if they can get the benefits without paying. Because of this reality, the union will eventually become ineffective as its financial resources dry up for lack of dues-paying members. This is the real aim of RTW laws - to strangle unions financially by forcing them to provide their benefits for free. It isn't about individual freedom. If an individual is so philosophically opposed to unions, then he/she has the freedom not to take, or to resign, a job which involves joining one. RTW laws do undercut the rights of the workers in a workplace who want a union to have one, rights guaranteed by the Wagner Act, by making it financially impossible for that union to operate effectively.
One other point - the Fifties and Sixties were the greatest periods of economic growth in the 20th century in the United States. They were also the periods of greatest union membership. If there is a conclusion to be drawn, it is that unions promote economic growth, not inhibit it.
The Entertainer December 15, 2012 at 02:08 am
The tragic events that unfolded today in Newtown Ct. have left me with nothing more to say other than God bless those children and their families! My heart goes out to the entire community, take the time to hug your loved ones, not just today.......Everyday!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Ossining-Croton-on-Hudson Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
CREAZZI UPHOLSTERY June 11, 2013 at 12:32 pm
IN BRANDETH ST
Krista Madsen (Editor) June 11, 2013 at 05:19 pm
Thanks for sharing this, I'll check into it!