.
Feedback

Supreme Court Upholds Obamacare

Ossining & Croton, what do you think about the decision?

The U.S. Supreme Court this morning revealed that a key part of President Obama's Affordable health care reform has been upheld.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act is the president's biggest achievement, signed in 2010, designed to ensure health care coverage and cut costs in the health care system.

The Supreme Court reviewed the constitutionality of the individual mandate, requiring nearly every American to buy health insurance. The legal question centers on whether such a regulation is allowed under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, which allows the federal government to regulate interstate activity.

The key Obama achievement was upheld in a 5-4 vote, with Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. siding to uphold the law and writing the decision.

The president is expected to speak about the decision in a few hours from the White House.

Pundits and politicians alike are already heralding the decision as a major political boon to Obama, whose supporters were concerned that an overturn of the law, or just the individual mandate, would harm the president's re-election bid this year.

Obama's health care law, which also requires health insurers to provide cover to children of policy holders up to 26 years old and bans insurance companies from denying coverage for pre-existing conditions, was challenged by several states which argued that some of its conditions, particularly the individual mandate, was unconstitutional.

Republicans also had vehemently opposed the health care law and their presumptive presidential nominee, Mitt Romney, has vowed to seek its repeal if he's elected.

WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THE DECISION? CLICK ON THE COMMENT BUTTON!

William Nuesslein June 29, 2012 at 07:28 am
During oral argument, Justice Scalia said that people would eventually buy health insurance when they needed it. That is really so missing the point that perhaps Scalia should buy insurance that covers senility. Then the devout Catholic, with a son in the priesthood, said that Hospitals should be able to refuse care to the uninsured. Without a law requiring emergency care, corporate hospitals would have to refuse care to the uninsured poor to protect their stockholders. Scalia said, in effect, "let them die."
I have yet to read the opinions, but as I understand it, Chief Justice Roberts got it right. He is a brilliant guy with some unsettling views (as is Justice Breyer). Thank goodness, logic overcame ideology in his case and we got a good ( in so many ways) result.
Lyla June 29, 2012 at 10:09 am
IMy husband was a lawyer for 40 years (now retired). Got out of litigation for just this reason. Too many judges making up laws (or ignoring them) to accomplish THEIR own ends. How any judge, even the Chief Justice of the United States, can characterize the financial consequences of failing to purchase insurance as a "tax" boggles the mind (the President doesn't even call it a tax). Taxes are imposed on income or transactions, not behavior. The Court's reasoning on the Medicaid expansion at least makes some sense. This doesn't. Is anyone still laboring under the false assumption that courts follow the law these days? Forget it.
Ralph Silano June 29, 2012 at 03:50 pm
This court and the moron that they work for are so out of control that we are a doomed country. If you do not believe this, just wait and see. If you vote for this moron in 2012 you are just as stupid.
eric June 30, 2012 at 04:40 pm
Ok first off as respectfully I can be to another commenter calling the President Obama a moron is like calling a bird- a dog.He went to Harvard that's not easy.And calling someone stupid for voting, oh sorry everyone should be just like you.The way you present you opinion makes you look like less of a intellect and more of an annoying commenter so who would take your opinion seriously. Any way I am not in favor of the health care mandate either. But I do find comfort in knowing that there is now a lot more security for people with medical conditions, and out of work youth that are covered until 26. But back to the Ruling if the court has now ruled the "tax" is legal and the law was passed as penalty, by definition alone shouldn't the law have to be resubmitted altogether? No taxation without representation , correct? No elected official voted in favor of a "tax" they voted in favor of a penalty. and is anyone is still believing mitt Romney is going to repeal something he made up? I don't even see a reason for him to say that, from what I understand of the ruling states have a right not in associate with this medical reform without facing cuts to Medicare. - sorry for hammer did this on my iPhone I just got lol
Chris July 1, 2012 at 04:14 pm
paraphrasing with hyperbole doesn't make your right... also i detect a bit of a racist under tone.... the way you mention Catholics is full of vitriol
Chris July 1, 2012 at 04:15 pm
having a degree from harvard doesn't make you smart... i think obama is a perfect example of this
eric July 7, 2012 at 04:48 pm
Wow Chris what a compiling argument you bring to the table. You give first hand accounts and evidence to back up your claim. I get more annoyed over closet racist ten anything else. Now then I do not favor Obama over any candidate . But saying a man that went to the most prestigious schools in the world ; furthermore saying he is uneducated is in its own right just a lack of basic common thinking. You disagree with his policy's fine ok that's the point of democracy. But because for your own personal reason you dislike this health mandate you probably dont even understand, you claim a man is less educated. Getting 25million people more health insurance is some easy task. And also I'm sure they give the locations and the codes to the most powerful nuclear arsenal to some guy.
James Adnaraf December 24, 2012 at 03:36 pm
Under Obamacare, you can go without insurance until you get sick, pay a fine that is much less than the premiums you did not pay while you were without insurance, and then get insurance coverage. That is a huge incentive to abuse the system. It is like waiting until after you have a car accident to get insurance, because the penalty is lower than the premiums you decided not to incur.
Likewise, small businesses will simply pay a small penalty, and save money, not offering any healthcare benefits. Thus, Obamacare actually discourages the private sector from offering health insurance. Once this is fully enacted, many companies (large, small, in between) will realize it is cheaper to pay the fine than pay insurance premiums, That is the Obamacare problem. No insults, no extreme emotion, just reality.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Ossining-Croton-on-Hudson Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
CREAZZI UPHOLSTERY June 11, 2013 at 12:32 pm
IN BRANDETH ST
Krista Madsen (Editor) June 11, 2013 at 05:19 pm
Thanks for sharing this, I'll check into it!