$100 Million Suit for Newtown Family at Stake in Attorney's Claim to State

An attorney representing the family of a 6-year-old survivor of the Sandy Hook School shooting says the state failed to protect the children from "foreseeable harm."

NEWTOWN, CT — Claiming that the state failed to protect Sandy Hook Elementary School from "foreseeable harm," an attorney is seeking to file a $100 million lawsuit on behalf of a 6-year-old survivor of the Dec. 14 shooting.

The action comes two weeks after 20 children and six educators were gunned down at the school by 20-year-old Adam Lanza, a Newtown resident who police said ultimately turned the gun on himself. Lanza reportedly shot and killed his mother, Nancy, before driving to the nearby school.

The attorney, Irving Pinsky, filed a request Thursday with Claims Commissioner J. Paul Vance Jr., according to an article by the Hartford Courant.

Because Connecticut has sovereign immunity, the Claims Commissioner must grant permission before the lawsuit could be filed, Pinsky told Patch in a telephone interview Saturday morning.

“I don’t know what’s going to happen here,” said the New Haven-based lawyer. "They [claims to the commissioner] generally take a long time."

“There’s plenty of history of them granting permission, but I’m not going to guess out loud what they’re going to do,” he added.

Pinsky is representing a 6-year-old girl identified in the claim as "Jill Doe." The claim says "the state Board of Education, the state Department of Education and the education commissioner failed to take steps to protect the minor children from foreseeable harm," the Courant reports.

It further states that the girl suffered emotional and psychological distress as a result of the things she heard and saw that day.

There are more than 600 students enrolled at Sandy Hook School, which is still closed off as a crime scene while state police continue their investigation. Sandy Hook students will be attending Chalk Hill School in neighboring Monroe for the foreseeable future.

“I’m pretty sure there’s many people who have attorneys lined up,” Pinsky said.

He is still building evidence for the claim, he said, through interviews with witnesses and looking into any potential prior acts of Adam Lanza. “That’s a big part of figuring what to do with any case,” he noted.

Pinsky, who was born and raised in Connecticut, said he hopes the state and country will take the Newtown tragedy as an opportunity to effect positive change and put in place new measures to protect against future school shootings.

"Society should be on edge," Pinsky said. "Something terrible happened."

He says there seems to be concensus that something needs to be done, but the "ways we do that is what people are arguing about” — whether it's more proactive relations with youngster, gun control, improved mental health treatment or a myriad of other related issues.

"We’ll never have a perfect society in my lifetime," Pinsky said, "but I want to make it better.”

Already, in the days following the shooting, President Barack Obama spoke of the need to do more to protect the country's children during a visit to Newtown. He also appointed Vice President Joe Biden to oversee the policy response to the tragedy.

Recognizing the need for a multi-prong approach and looking to ride the building momentum to effect change, the group Newtown United was formed in the wake of the tragedy. A cross-section of the community, the group has the support of elected officials and is at work refining its mission.

Stephen king January 02, 2013 at 11:58 AM
Sue parents for stupidity.Bet I win
FrankO January 02, 2013 at 12:01 PM
Irving the leech
Michael Skelton January 02, 2013 at 12:05 PM
Greedy pieces of junk. The parents should be ashamed of themselves for trying to reap benefits from a tragedy such as this. Scumbags!
just saying January 02, 2013 at 12:05 PM
That is disgusting. How can the state be responsible for this kind of tragedy?! Obviously the child was tramatized, but who wasn't? What a way to make a quick buck. The aldults involved should be ashamed of themselves. If this event was "forseeable" to the parents, they should be sued for not stopping the deaths of so many innocent people. How sad.
Ron Rogers January 02, 2013 at 01:23 PM
The parents should be thanking God that their child was not taken. Audacity!!!!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »