Marshall Fine was taken aback by death threats this week after he wrote a negative review of the new film, “The Dark Knight Rises," on RottenTomatoes.com.
This morning, he was shocked by the deaths at a premiere of the movie in Colorado.
"There were so many nasty comments which they construed as death threats," said Fine today. "There were also some fairly misogynistic comments towards Christy Lemire from the Associated Press, who had the second negative review, that they stopped the comments and are rethinking their comment policy, in terms of whether or not they should allow anonymous comments anymore."
Fine said he was taken aback when he started seeing the responses to his review—and by the media attention.
"I was surprised at the volume of the thing—how big the response was to my review—it did surprise me. I got a lot of emails from friends saying 'Are you okay?'" said Fine. "I personally don't feel as though I was ever specifically threatened. I don't feel threatened by anonymous comments on a thread on a website. I didn't get threatening emails. I didn't get telephone calls or anything. It's pretty easy to be courageous and make threats anonymously when you're sitting in your basement on the Internet."
Now, he is watching the Colorado shooting story unfold online and on television at his Ossining home.
A Huffington Post blogger, he wrote about the contrast this morning.
Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone everyday with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.
"It's tragic and it says a lot about how easy it is to get these kinds of weapons and go into a theater and do something like this," said Fine. "I think that when all the facts come out, we'll find it had nothing to do with the movie itself. This is a guy who was looking for an opportunity to do something and thought, 'Where can I find the most people in one place while they're showing that first showing—that'll be packed—that's where I'll go.'"
On his website, hollywoodandfine.com, Fine wrote today regarding the tragedy in Colorado and the online threats against him. Here's the opening:
Me and Batman: Some perspective
As the minor media frenzy about me being the first critic to post a negative review of “The Dark Knight Rises” reached its mini-crescendo on Wednesday (when I actually had six requests for interviews – five of them from Canadian outlets – about so-called “death threats” on Rotten Tomatoes aimed at me), I kept thinking to myself, “This must really be a slow news week if I’m the headline.”
As if to prove the point, actual news happened last night in the form of a tragedy, when someone walked into a suburban Denver multiplex and killed more than a dozen people. And it happened at a midnight show of “The Dark Knight Rises.”
So let me say two things: First of all, while there is nothing yet in the news reports about the deranged individual who shot those people, I’d be willing to bet there was no relationship between his crime and the movie itself. He would have done this anyway; “TDKR” simply offered a location where he was guaranteed to have a crowd on which he could open fire.
Second, while I’ve been held up this week as the “victim” of death threats, at no point did I ever actually receive a personal threat. Anonymous and violent rants posted to Rotten Tomatoes (and even a couple to my website)? Come on – I mean, I understand why Rotten Tomatoes closed down comments for the movie because some of the stuff posted about me and Christy Lemire of Associated Press was pretty vile.
And I understand why Indiewire used the words “death threats” in their headline. As we used to say, that’s what sells newspapers (or, in this case, drives page-views).
But I did not feel threatened. As I said in a couple of interviews, there were no crowds with pitchforks and torches storming my house. These were just people spouting off, venting anger; I happened to be the target. But it’s not as if I was receiving phone calls or even emails directly; I was the subject of anonymous posting. It’s easy to have courage when you’re sitting alone at the keyboard in your home, behind the cloak of anonymity.
Read more on his blog post at hollywoodandfine.com
The Citizens won (watch the movie and read the news articles) and were not prosecuted, but praised and elected. Need I say more? THAT is what the Second Amendment is for - not game hunting - The Second Amendment is meant to allow the Citizens to organize and form a well regulated militia, if necessary, to do battle with an oppressive government. That is why the RIGHT of the Citizens to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. Do you people actually know what the history and precepts of this Great Nation are? I shudder at the ignorance of the people- I am truly worried for America and the US Constitution.
I grew up with the credo : we shall overcome - now I am worried about those I grew up with who are in power doing awful things with the country. Now I support the NRA, hesitantly, but support nonetheless. The pendulum has swung too wildly - time to bring it back to a sanity of some sort of center. The Right of the People to organize a well regulated militia: mass murders or not, I'll stick with allowing the sale of 100 round mags - there are bigger issues and while it's unfortunate this happened, I'll stick with being on the side of reasonable open access to weaponry and accessories. My concern is no infringement of Rights. Therein lies the Court battle and judicial elections/appointments. The system grinds on. Good.
Battle of Athens was real.
So do not tread on my right to keep and BEAR arms. The Second Amendment makes no distinction between keeping and bearing arms at home or in public. It was not meant or written to intend ONLY at home.
You know, I checked to see where I got my numbers. I used the stats for people killed by guns by any cause in 2005: about 29,000: it turned out to be not just murder, but suicide as well. Then I looked at actual Killed In Action in WWII (www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USA/ref/Casualties/Casualties-Intro.html) and it was 234,000 - but it did not include those who died from accidents or disease. So I should qualify my stats and say that guns are involved in as many deaths of civilians in eight years as total of US soldiers killed in WWII. Still crazy, but I draw comfort from the fact that Mexico, Guatemala, South Africa, Estonia (?!) and the rest of Central America has higher rates than we do.
The only pattern I see here is a total crazy pattern out of Bachmann and crowd. This is just nutty beyond belief. I have to give you the benefit of the doubt that you don't actually believe that stuff, otherwise there's no point in a rational conversation with you.
Although the "gun homicide" rate is very high in the US, the total "homicide" rate compared to other countries has the US way down on the list. In Mexico the homicide rate is 20 times higher than in the US and they don't even have the highest rate. Having guns available to us keeps us safer, but if you choose not to have one, then that's your choice.
Anyway, Caroline Glick says it better than me in re the Muslim Brotherhood running the White House with POTUS permitting and planning the whole thing. http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Article.aspx?id=279075 And the disrespect shown to Obummah? he deserves every bit of it. He's scammed the American People. He has set us up for a takeover. Yes I believe that.
We have major trouble with this character. He IS a traitor and should be jailed forthwith. Obama is a clear and present danger to the world. He needs to go - NOW. NOBAMA in 2012!! HE will bring the end of the world - for real.