Why's solar so much cheaper in Germany than in New York?

The US cost per watt for solar would drop by $1 or more if we had the same solar policies as our fellow solar installers in Europe.

In 2011, Germany installed more solar electric capacity every two days than was installed in the entire State of New York during all of year.

Why is that? The price of raw materials is roughly the same in both places, as is hourly rate of labor. A new study shows that big difference is the appalling red tape and high soft costs that solar faces in the US and manages to avoid in Germany.* 

Just like we buy potatoes or chicken by the pound, is solar business, we talk in terms of the price per watt of installed solar capacity to estimate and assess the components that comprise a solar electric system.

For example, the average price per watt of photovoltaic modules in 2011 was $1.83 in the US and $1.82 in Germany–virtually identical. This makes sense, since installers in both countries had equal access to the most popular Chinese-made modules with roughly comparable pricing.

The other major hardware components (e.g. inverters, racking) cost about $1.02 in the US and about half that, $0.56, in Germany, probably due to economies of scale in Europe. After all, annual residential installations in German were 9.5 times greater per capita than in the US in 2011. The non-module components have more suppliers than the modules do. So competition and volume help drive prices down.

That puts us at $2.85 per watt in the US and at $2.38 in Germany, a difference but not huge. But wait, we still have to pay for all the non-hardware costs!

These include, labor for installation, customer acquisition, system design, labor for permitting, permit fees, overhead, profit and other residual scope of work costs, such as post-installation monitoring, etc.

For the average German residential system, these balance of system (BOS) and soft costs add another $0.62 per watt, or about 40% of the hardware costs, yielding a final $3.00 per watt cost.   

However, in the US these BOS/soft costs added a whopping $3.34 per watt, or about 117% of the hardware costs, yieldiing a final $6.19 per watt. 

In short, in the US the soft costs more than double the price of solar.  The study estimates the average price per watt in 2011 for a less than 10 kilowatt system in the US was 206% higher in the US over Germany ($6.19 versus $3.00).

Why is solar so much more in the US? The researchers had some interesting findings.

Of the BOS/soft costs in both countries, installation labor was the largest, e.g. $0.59 per watt in US compared with $0.23 in Germany.

The results show a sizable gap of 36 hours between the U.S. and Germany in average installation times for PV systems of 10 kilowatts or smaller in size. The average time for installation in the US was 75 hours versus 39 in Germany.

This longer time in US may be partly explained by the higher frequency with which US installers penetrate the existing roof. That is less common in Germany due to different roofing material there (tile there versus shingle here) and higher wind speeds in many US locations (California). 

Installers in Germany rely even more on (cheaper) non-electrician installation labor than in the US (77% vs. 65%). But even if the US labor cost matched that in Germany, the price per watt would still be $3 higher here than there.

More telling questions are: What is my cost of acquiring a customer here v. there? And: How long does it takes to complete a job once I have sold it here v. there? 

Let’s look at customer acquisition first. We can break this into three phases (or costs) to the installer. How much more does the US installer has to spend on each of these stages versus her German colleagues? 

   Marketing + advertising: US installer spends 17X more ($0.34 v. $0.02/W)

   System design: US installer spends 10X more ($0.11 v $0.01/W)

   Other (sales process, follow up): US installer spends 6X more ($0.24 v $0.04/W).

Before a job is even sold, the US installer has spent $0.69 on acquiring the job, seven times more than the German installer’s marketing/sales investment of $0.10.

Some underlying facts drive up the US customer acquisition cost per watt. These include the much lower sales closure rate in the US (designing systems that don’t get sold) and the larger average system size in Germany.**

Let’s look at project cycle time. Residential projects take 126 days to develop in the U.S. vs. 35 days in Germany.  That is four times longer! According the study, shorter project development times in Germany contribute to an apparent price gap of about $0.20 per watt. 

Interestingly, residential PV systems are larger in Germany (“partly due to differences in policy design” as the researchers diplomatically put it), allowing German installers to benefit from economies of scale and work flow. The researchers find this saves an additional $0.15 per watt. 

The project cycle gap is principally driven by the red tape associated with the predominant way in which US photovoltaic systems must be permitted and accepted by the utilities. 

The project size gap is principally driven by Germany’s national Feed-in Tariff, which is far more effective to our net metering approach in making solar power a salable and bankable commodity for owners, installers, and utilities.

Policies matter. The net metering policies dominant in the US are strangling our solar potential.  Germany thrives because they have long moved to a much simpler, bankable, pre-negotiated approach (For more, see Feed-in Tariffs post.)

Of course, the customer acquisition gap discussed earlier is largely driven by the policy gap as well. It just takes longer to explain the needlessly complex US net metering and interconnection process to potential customers, which leads to closing fewer sales, which leads to higher per sale costs.

It's safe to conclude that, within a year,  the US solar cost per watt would drop by $1–or more!–if we had suddenly no “difference in policy design” with our fellow solar installers in Europe.

*Find some informed chatter about the Lawrence Berkeley Lab study,  here at MIT Tech Review and here at LinkedIn AEE Group.

**Residential (<10kW) solar systems are larger in Germany, not because they have bigger roofs (they don’t) or more sun (they don’t). They are larger on average (US median size in 2011 was 4.95kW versus 6.8kW in Germany, because German home and business owners maximize the solar output from their roof to take advantage of the ability feeding in excess electricity to the grid under the Feed-in Tariff revenue they get for doing so. Ironically, Germany gets less sunlight than New York, as the country is about at the latitude of James Bay and northern Ontario.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

James Adnaraf January 06, 2013 at 09:22 PM
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/europe/germany/120217/germany-battles-over-the-future-solar-energy This is an interesting link on Germany's solar power efforts. According to this article, which is from February 2012, solar was expected to meet 4.5% of Germany's energy needs in 2012. Good, but that is still a small amount of the total need. And, you cannot run a car on solar. Solar energy is a long way from providing a significant reduction of the need to buy oil from hostile countries. Delighted to see it provide a bigger piece of the energy pie, but keep it in context.
John Q. Public January 07, 2013 at 06:06 PM
john January 07, 2013 at 07:24 PM
We need more nuclear energy in this country.
Solar Fan January 08, 2013 at 12:35 PM
Citing 2011 data in the solar industry is the equivalent of talking about the U.S. economy and citing figures from the Clinton boom. The Solar industry has been decimated. Poly costs are now below US$20kg vs near US$200 a few years back. The U.S. has higher costs all around because it is not a mature market; there are totally different regulatory standards at the state level; there is no strong national feed-in-tariff incentive program like German used to have during its boom; the U.S. has endless environmental regulations that make installations prohibitive, the financial system is not in place to finance projects like in Germany and many other countries; solar is not a "mass market" product in the U.S. as in Germany - how many of your neighbors have solar panels installed on their roofs or land? -- it goes on and on -- lastly and perhaps most importantly the U.S. does not want to encourage solar hence the misguided trade action taken against the major solar companies manufacturing in China. This misguided action hurt end customers in the U.S. and will result in far fewer jobs being created than otherwise would have been in a normal market economy.
Leo Wiegman January 12, 2013 at 04:54 PM
@Solar Fan: Thanks, you are spot on with your comments. US regulatory environment largely at the subnational (state) level is not aligned to maximize private investment in solar. It could be with introdution of feed-in tariff and other tried-and-true policies that work well in Ontario and all over Europe.
Leo Wiegman July 08, 2013 at 10:23 AM
LBNL moved the study to this link: http://emp.lbl.gov/publications/why-are-residential-pv-prices-germany-so-much-lower-united-states-scoping-analysis


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »