"Tea party extremists such as yourself, Mr. Bazzo would rip to pieces every fairly negotiated public employee contract ever agreed upon. However, I am sure that would be just fine with you."
"Mr. Bazzo does not care about decades of legally negotiated contracts. Whatever loophole he and others can find to wiggle out of an agreement they will use."
The two above comments more or less summarize the responses I get when I write about the unaffordable public employee contracts. "Fairly negotiated" and "legally negotiated" contracts, one term incorrect, the other correct. Yes, legally negotiated, but only in the perverse system we in New York live under. However, "Fairly negotiated" no way, no how. There never was and never has been anything fair about negotiations with public unions. The problem is there was never anyone representing the employer, read that the taxpayer.
Seems to me the problem here isn't, "scammers", it's just bad management.
Vacation Sick Personal Bereavement Holidays Here is what we give our cops in Clarkstown and Orangetown 30 vac 24 sick 8 bereavement 12holidays 7 personal In Clarkstown, we know the reasons for overtime. Do you?
Vacation Personal Sick Holidays Bereavement
Yet as I use my real nmae, you do not, so I do not know who you are. a.b.
Yet as I use my real name, you do not, so I do not know who you are. a.b.
There are other answers to eliminate overtime but they need to be negotiated. Use of part time reserve officers paid per-diem is a possibility or simply hiring enough officers is another. You can bark at the moon if you'd like but until management takes the bull by the horns nothing good will happen.
I would suspect that most folks, at times, do appreciate OT possibilities ... in order to ram up their take-home pay. I'd certainly take that route. However, that does not automatically mean that those earning should be part of a pension calculation as they are now. That's the next step the state needs to take. To separate these two. Workers should be entitled to a reasonable pension ... one that includes some employee contribution and an end-result that is not subject to arbitrary changes. Whether widespread or not, there is abuse ... and the public wants it curtailed. And I don't think that is an entirely unreasonable request at all.
There is nothing that cannot be resolved fairly.